Mayilai Sugumar, v. The Authorised Officer,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.3155 of 2012 Mayilai Sugumar ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The Authorised Officer, Indian Overseas Bank, Head Office, No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. Indian Overseas Bank, Rep. By its Chairman and Managing Director, No.763, Mount Road, Chennai - 600 002.

3. The Union of India Rep. By Secretary to Govt.

Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.

....

Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of declaration, declaring that Sec. 32 of Central Act 30/2002 as Unconstitutional, void and of no effect.

For petitioner : No appearance For respondents : R1 and R3 - No appearance Mr.F.B.Benjamin George for R2

ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 16.12.2019, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 To

1. The Authorised Officer, Indian Overseas Bank, Head Office, No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.

2. The Chairman and Managing Director, Indian Overseas Bank, No.763, Mount Road, Chennai - 600 002.

3. The Secretary to Govt.

Union of India Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.

+1cc to Mr.F.B.Benjamin George, Advocate sr.214 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.NO. 981 W.P. No.3155 of 2012 nrl(co) nr 03/02/2020 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/