Madras High CourtWP/6306/2021allowed

Harikrishnan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-03-12Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.03.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH WP No. 6306 of 2021 Hari Krishnan ... Petitioner vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Villupuram District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Crime Branch Villupuram District, Villupuram District.

3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Ant Land Grabbing Branch, Villupuram District.

4. The Inspector of Police, Vanur Police Station, Villupuram District.

5. The Inspector of Police, Superintendent of Police Office, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Villupuram District.

6. Abirami ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents not to harass the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Manikandhan For Respondent : Mr.C.Raghavan Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) for RR1 to R5

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent Police not to harass the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Taking into consideration the fact that the nature of the dispute involved in this case is a property dispute, it is for the parties to redress the same before the appropriate Civil Court and the respondent police will have no role to play in a case of this nature.

4. This Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent police not to interfere with the property dispute and it is open for the parties to agitate their rights before the competent civil court. No costs.

sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar jv To