R.Basakaradoss, v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.06.2023 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU R.Baskaradoss .. Petitioner -vs1. The District Collector, Collector Office, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

2. The Joint Director, Urban Development Director Office, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

3. The Tahsildar, Vandalur Taluka Office, Chennai 600 048.

4. The Commissioner, Nandivaram Guduvanchery Municipality, Guduvanchery 603 202.

5. The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Rep. by its Member Secretary, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

6. N.Mohan

7. M.Gurumoorthy .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st, 3rd and 4th respondents to remove the unauthorized construction of compound wall and gate by the 6th and 7th respondents, measuring an extent of 700 sq.ft. situated at Plot No.17 & 18, comprised in Survey No.508/1A, 5A, 515/1A, Pangajammal Nagar, Nandhivaram Village, Nandhivaram Guduvanchery Municipality, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kancheepuram District, within Sub-Resigration District of Guduvanchery, Registration District of South Chennai.

For the Petitioner :

Mr.T.Ramachandran For the Respondents :

Mr.P.Muthukumar, State Government Pleader, for RR 1 to 3 :

No appearance for RR 4 and 5 :

Mr.M.Vijay Anand for R-6 :

Mr.V.Tamilamudhu for R-7 * * * * *

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) We have heard Mr.T.Ramachandran, learned counsel for the petition, Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3, Mr.M.Vijay Anand, learned counsel for respondent

No.6 and Mr.V.Tamilamudhu, learned counsel for respondent No.7.

2. Directions are sought to remove the unauthorized construction of compound wall and gate by the sixth and seventh respondents in Plot Nos. 17 and 18.

3. We asked the learned counsel for the petitioner as to who are the owners of Plot Nos.17 and 18. The learned counsel for the petitioner replies that respondent No.6 is the owner of the said plots and respondent No.6 has carried out the construction of compound wall.

4. We fail to understand as to how the petitioner would be affected if the respondent No.6 carried out the construction of compound wall in his own plot. We are not going to entertain such petitions. No public cause is involved in the present matter. The writ petition, as such, is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.) 27.06.2023 Index : yes/no

: Yes/No sra THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J.

(sra) To:

1. The District Collector, Collector Office, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

2. The Joint Director, Urban Development Director Office, No.807, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

3. The Tahsildar, Vandalur Taluka Office, Chennai 600 048.

4. The Commissioner, Nandivaram Guduvanchery Municipality, Guduvanchery 603 202.

5. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Thalamuthu Natarajan Maligai, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

27.06.2023