← Library
Madras High CourtA/2103/2019withdrawn dismissed

Mrs.Kunnoth Kunji Kannan Padmakshi Alias Padma v. Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan

2019-11-06Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION) WEDNESDAY, THE 06TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA A.NO.2103 OF 2019 IN C.S.NO.321 OF 2012 Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan, Vellancherry House, P.O.Kizhupillikara, Thrissur, Kerala 680 704 ..Plaintiff -vs1.Mrs. Kunnoth Kunji Kannan Padmakshi @ Padma 2.Ms. Vellacherry Meera Kumaran, Both residing at No.46/4, 1st Avenue, Shastri Nagar, Chennai 600 020 3.Mr.K.A.Abdul Majeed, Karekulam House, P.O, Kizhupillikara, Thrissur Kerala 680 704 ...Defendants A.NO.2103 OF 2019:

1.Mrs. Kunnoth Kunji Kannan Padmakshi @ Padma 2.Ms. Vellacherry Meera Kumaran, Both residing at No.46/4, 1st Avenue, Shastri Nagar, Chennai 600 020 ..Applicants/Defendants 1 & 2 -vs1.Mr.V.K.Vijayaraghavan, Vellancherry House, P.O.Kizhupillikara, Thrissur, Kerala 680 704 ...Respondent/Plaintiff

2.Mr.K.A.Abdul Majeed, Karekulam House, P.O, Kizhupillikara, Thrissur Kerala 680 704 ...Respondent/Defendant No.3 This Application praying that this Honble Court be pleased to grant leave to receive the documents mentioned in list hereunder for being adduced as evidence of the side of the applicants/defendants 1 and 2 in the above suit. List of Documents Decree of divorce dated 24.05.1996 of Honble High Court of Republic of Singapore in Divorce Petition No.1417/1995 with the deed of settlement dated 10.11.1994 9 (Xerox Copy).

This Application coming on this day before this court for hearing the court made the following order:

This application is filed by the applicants / defendants 1 and 2 seeking to grant leave to receive the Decree of Divorce dated 24.05.1996 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Republic of Singapore in Divorce Petition No.1417 of 1995 with Deed of Settlement dated 10.11.1994, which is the photocopy and the same is subject to proof and admissibility by the respondent/plaintiff.

2. Now, it is stated by the learned counsel for the applicants that he has applied for certified copy of the said decree. As and when he receives the original of the said document, he will have to take out a separate application to

receive the same and with such liberty, he seeks to withdraw this application.

3. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants, he is permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to file a fresh application within a period of four weeks, along with certified copy of the document as mentioned above. The learned counsel for the applicant has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Judges Summons to this application.

4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/.P.S.N.J 06.11.2019 //Certified to be a true copy// Dated this the day of 2019.

R.s/18.11.2019 COURT OFFICER From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.