C.Vasudevan v. A.Banumathy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.09.2019 CORAM :

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY and M.P.No.1 of 2013 C.Vasudevan ... Petitioner Vs.

A.Banumathy ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed in C.M.A.No.203 of 2011 dated 17.07.2011 on the file of the VII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai against the order passed in I.A.No.11201 of 2011 in O.S.No.5484 of 2011 on the file of the XVIII Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai on 25.08.2011.

For Petitioner : Mr.I.Murugan For Respondent : Not ready in notice

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous for the reason that the suit itself was disposed of and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the grounds of the revision. Page 1 / 3

M. DURAISWAMY,J.

va 2.In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous . No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Index : No 26.09.2019 Internet : Yes va To 1.The VII Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai.

2.The XVIII Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai.

and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Page 2 / 3

Page 3 / 3