← Library
Madras High CourtSA/1052/2012dismissed for nonprosecution

Munuswamy v. Ganesan

2024-09-09Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.09.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR S.A. No. 1052 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 Munuswamy ... Appellant Vs.

1.

Ganesan (Died) 2.

Muthuraman 3.

Rajaraman 4.

Vaanmeeganathan 5.

Junior Engineer, T.N.E.B., Mamallapuram having its office at Mamallapuram and Post, Thirukkalundram Taluk.

6.

Rangarajan 7.

Devaki 8.

Thavamani 9.

Venkatesan 10.

Sumithra ... Respondents (Respondents 7 to 10 brought on Record as LRs of the deceased 1st Respondent viz. (Ganesan) vide Court Order dated 16.03.2022 made in C.M.P.Nos.3967, 3969 & 3970 of 2022 in S.A.No.1052 of 2012) 1/4

Second Appeal filed Under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 18.10.2010 made in A.S. No.26 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Sub-Ordinate Judge at Chengalpattu confirming the judgment and decree dated 21.07.2009 made in O.S.No.246 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial magistrate at Thirukkalukundram. For Appellant :

No Appearance For Respondents 2, 3, 7 to 10 :

M/s. S. Ramesh For R5 :

No Appearance For R6 :

Insufficient Address *****

JUDGMENT

There was no representation on behalf of the appellant for the past two hearing dates, hence this matter has been listed today under the caption "For Dismissal".

2.

Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, therefore, this Court is inclined to dismiss this second appeal for nonprosecution. 3.

Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed as non-prosecution. 2/4

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed. No costs. 09.09.2024 stn Index:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No To:

1. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

stn 3/4

S.A. No. 1052 of 2012 09.09.2024 4/4