Madras High CourtWP/2044/2018disposed of

S.Maheswaran, v. The State Of Tamilnadu,

2023-07-20Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice P.D.Audikesavalu6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.07.2023 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU S.Maheswaran ..

Petitioner Vs.

1. The State of Tamilnadu The Secretariat, St.George Fort Chennai - 600 009.

2. The District Collector District Collectorate

3. The Superintendant of Police Superintendent of Police Office

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer Katcheri Veedhi

5. The Executive Engineer Amaravathi Vadinilakkottam Dharapuram, Tiruppur District.

6. The Tahsildar Tahsildar Office, Madathukulam

7. The Superintendent of Engineer TNEB Office, Eripalayam, Udumalpet

8. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Deputy Superintendent of Police Office

9. The Executive Engineer (Highways) Highways Office, Madathukulam

10. K.Kanakaraj

11. K.Karuppusamy [R1 deleted as per order dated 02.02.2018 in WP.No.2044 of 2018] [R1 impleaded vide order dated 02.02.2018 in WP.No.2044 of 2018] [R10 & R11 impleaded vide order dated 02.02.2018 n W.P.No.2044 of 2018] ..

Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 18.11.2017 based on the enquiry reports of the respondents 5 to 7 dated 26.11.2015 & 12.04.2017.

For the Petitioner : No Appearance For the Respondents : Mrs.R.Anitha Special Government Pleader for R2 to R4 & R6 Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh for R7 Mr.K.Mylsamy for R10 & R11

ORDER

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) None appears for the petitioner.

2. The matter is of the year 2018. The petitioner seeks a direction against the second respondent to take action pursuant to the enquriy report of respondents 5 and 6 for disconnection of electricity and upon theft of water.

3. Counter filed on behalf of the seventh respondent states that the Collector has not issued orders for disconnection.

4. Learned counsel for the seventh respondent submits that

there were two service connections. One has already been disconnected on 17.10.2017 itself on the basis of the request made by the consumer.

5. The matter pertains to be of the year 2018. In case the petitioner has any grievance as on date, the petitioner may make a fresh representation, which would be considered by the Authorities on its own merits.

6. The writ petition, as such, stands disposed of. There will be no order as to costs.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.) 20.07.2023 Index :

Yes/No :

Yes/No drm To

1. The State of Tamilnadu

The Secretariat, St.George Fort Chennai - 600 009.