← Library
Madras High CourtWP/11975/2015disposed of

R.Elumalai v. The Government Of Tamilnadu

2015-04-24Honourable Mr Justice D. Hariparanthaman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.04.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.11975 of 2015 R.Elumalai ... Petitioner vs.

1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary Environment and Forest Department Secretariat Chennai-600 009

2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest Having Office at Panagal Maaligai Saidapet Chennai-600 015

3. The District Forest Officer Thiruvannamalai South Division.

4. The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu Office at D.M.S.Compound Teynampet Chennai-600 018 ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to count half of the service rendered by the petitioner as Plot Watcher on daily wage basis from 01.08.1979 till 03.12.2005 along with the regular service rendered by him as Forest Watcher from 04.12.2005 till the date of his retirement namely 31.12.2014 as qualifying service, send the revised proposal to the fourth respondent, grant pension to the petitioner with all consequential monetary benefits.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Mr.N.Inbanathan, Government Advocate (Forest)

O R D E R

With the consent of both sides, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2. The petitioner was appointed as Plot Watcher on daily wage basis in the Forest Department on 01.08.1979. His services were regularized vide order dated 01.08.2005 and was brought into regular time scale of pay as Forest Watcher on 04.12.2005 after a period of 26 years of long service. The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to count half of the service rendered by the petitioner as Plot Watcher on daily wage basis from 01.08.1979 till 03.12.2005 along with the regular service rendered by him as Forest Watcher from 04.12.2005 till the date of his retirement namely 31.12.2014 as qualifying service, send the revised proposal to the fourth respondent, grant pension to the petitioner with all consequential monetary benefits.

3. According to the petitioner, he was not paid pension, since, he did not render 10 years of regular service in the respondent Department. Further, the grievance of the petitioner is that half of the service rendered by him as Plot Watcher on daily wage basis was not taken into account along with his regular service as Forest Watcher from 04.12.2005 till the date of her retirement on 31.12.2014 as qualifying service.

4. As per Rule 11(2) of the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978, 50% of the contingency services will be taken into account for the purpose of pension, if the employee is subsequently absorbed in regular service. This Court had passed various orders on the above lines, and one such order was made in W.P.No.33732 of 2014 dated 19.12.2014 [R.Yuvaraj v. Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government], wherein, this Court directed the respondents therein to count half of the service of the petitioner therein as Casual Labourer along with regular service for the purpose of pension. The order dated 19.12.2014 in the said W.P.No.33732 of 2014 is implemented by the Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University by order dated 24.02.2015.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner relied on a decision of this Court in W.P.No.8205 of 2011 dated 19.04.2011 [M.Gopal Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government], which decision was confirmed by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.27 and 28 of 2012 dated 13.02.2012 [Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary to Govt., Vs. M.Gopal].

6. I am of the view that the said judgment is directly on this issue. Non-regularisation of the petitioner for the decades together is not on his default.

7. In these circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to count half of the service of the petitioner as Plot Watcher on daily wage basis along with his regular service rendered as Forest Watcher as qualifying service for the purpose of pension. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar srn/nvi To

1. The Secretary The Government of TamilNadu Environment and Forest Department Secretariat, Chennai-600 009

2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest Having Office at Panagal Maaligai Saidapet, Chennai-600 015

3. The District Forest Officer, Tiruvannamalai South Division.

4. The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu Office at D.M.S.Compound Teynampet, Chennai-600 018 +1cc to Mr.S.Mani, Advocate, S.R.No.23554 +1cc to the Special Government Pleader(Forest), S.R.No.22778 Writ Petition No.11975 of 2015 PVR(CO) CA(26/05/2015)