T.Aarangi v. The Collector, Cuddalore

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.01.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.28325 of 2013 T.Aarangi ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector, Cuddalore District.

2. The Tahsildar, Cuddalore Taluk and District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore District.

4. V.Amirthalingam

5. V.Kanakasabai .... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide necessary protection to the petitioner in the construction of building in new S.No.22/10 - 0.45 cents in Arisiperiankuppam Village Cuddalore Taluk, Cuddalore District for use as place for performing last rites and ceremonies to dead persons.

For petitioner : Mr.R.Gururaj For respondents : Mr.R.S.Selvam - R1 to R3 Government Advocate Mrs.R.Meenal - R4 & R5

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has now become infructuous. He has made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the endorsement and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rli To

1. The District Collector, Cuddalore District.

2. The Tahsildar, Cuddalore Taluk and District.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore District.

+1cc to Mr.R.Subramanian, Advocate, SR.No.3655. +1cc to Government Pleader, SR.No.3925.

W.P. No.28325 of 2013 SJ(CO) CSR: 26.02.2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/