K.P.Ravikumar v. The Inspector Of Police

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

This matter came up for hearing today under the caption 'For Being Mentioned' at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the freezed amount lying in the bank are derived from his business and it is no way connected with the case in Crime No.1101 of 2019. He further submitted that the entire amount has been seized during investigation, contrary to the complaint. The admitted case is that only a portion of amount is alleged to be involved in the case. Hence, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought to clarify the same and direct the 1st respondent Police to defreeze the undisputed amount and the petitioner to avail the same. 3.This Court having considered all these aspects during arguments, had passed a detailed order on 29.04.2021. Now accepting the petitioner's submission and clarifying the order again, would amount to review. Page No.1/3

4.On the submissions made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that the investigation completed in Crime No.1101 of 2019, charge sheet filed and there is now change of circumstances, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file a petition for defreezing the amount lying in the bank.

5.It is made clear that the observations made in the order, dated 29.04.2021 is only for the purpose of disposal of the above petition, which is during the period of investigation before filing the charge sheet. The trial Court to consider the petition if any filed for defreezing the amount uninfluenced by the observations made on 29.04.2021. 6.Finding that now charge sheet filed before the trial Court, the time limit fixed by this Court on 29.04.2021 for completing investigation and concluding the trial would not arise now. 22.10.2021 vv2 Page No.2/3

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

vv2 22.10.2021 Page No.3/3