← Library
Madras High CourtSA/1134/2012withdrawn dismissed

K.V. Kolanchi v. P. Rukmani

2025-06-06Honourable Mr Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.06.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP

1. K.V.Kolanchi

2. N.Rajeshwari

3. S.Lakshmi .. Appellants Vs.

1. P.Rukmani

2. Mrs.M.Rajalakshmi

3. P.Santhana Krishnan K.V.Ramalingam (died)

4. K.V.Ragupathy

5. K.V.R.Vasantha Ramalingam

6. K.V.R.Jayachandran

7. K.V.R.Babu

8. K.V.R.Sridharan

9. R.Vani @ Sraswathi

...Respondents

PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.11.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court - III), Vridhachalam in A.S.No.78 of 2010, modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 21.01.2010 passed by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Vridhachalam in O.S.No.97 of 2005.

For Appellants : Mr.T.S.Baskaran For Respondent : No Appearance for R-1 to R-3 & R-5 to R-9 Died - R-4

J U D G M E N T

This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 22.11.2011 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court - III), Vridhachalam in A.S.No.78 of 2010, modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 21.01.2010 passed by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Vridhachalam in O.S.No.97 of 2005.

2. The learned Counsel for the Appellants filed a memo stating that the parties to the Second Appeal had settled the dispute among themselves, since the subject matter of the Appeal is partitioned. Therefore, they had withdrawn the Appeal. The memo filed to that effect and the memo is recorded.

In the result, this Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to Court fee.

06.06.2025 dh To

1. The Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court - III), Vridhachalam.

2. The Principal Sub Judge, Vridhachalam.

3. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP. J dh 06.06.2025