S.T.Vivek Sundar, M/A 20 Years v. The State Rep By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.04.2018 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.No.10537 of 2018 S.T.Vivek Sundar

...Petitioner

Vs.

State Rep. by Sub Inspector of Police G1 Chengam Police Station Chengam, Tiruvannamalai District.

... Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to direct the respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 28.03.2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.N.Viswanathan For Respondent : Mr.C.Raghavan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the respondent police to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 28.03.2018.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

3. In view of the order passed by this Court in Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd., -Vs- The Assistant Commissioner of Police, J2, Adyar Police Station, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 and another [2016 (5) CTC 577 : 2016-2-LW (Crl.) 499], this petition is not maintainable.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner set out in Sugesan (supra).

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mk To

1. The Sub Inspector of Police G1 Chengam Police Station Chengam, Tiruvannamalai District.

2.The Public prosecutor High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.K.Venkat, Advocate, S.R.No.24704 Crl.O.P.No.10537 of 2018 SSD(CO) RRK(05/04/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/