A.Periyasamy, v. The Secretary To Government,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.04.2023 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.19262 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.16988 of 2016
1. A.Periyasamy, S/o Appadurai
2. P.Devi
3. A.Periyasamy, S/o Arumugam
4. P.Vinayagam
5. S.Nagalingam
6. T.Anbarasan
7. Vasuki
8. P.Muniyamuthu ..
Petitioners vs
1. The Secretary to Government Rural Development and Local Administration Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai-600 009.
2. The Collector, Perambalur District.
3. The Assistant Planning Officer (Vi) (Ma) District Rural Development Agency
4. The Taluk Development (Taluk Panchayat) Officer Veppur, Kunnam Taluk
5. The Tahsildar (Reputed) Taluk Office, Kunnam Taluk
6. The President The Village Panchayat Othiyam, Kunnam Taluk
7. The Village Administrative Officer Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District.
8. C.Pappathy
9. Vijayalakshmi
10. Kalaiselvi
11. Kaliammal
12. Chellam
13. Selammal
14. Lakshmi, W/o Rajendran
15. Maruthambal
16. Lakshmi, W/o Muthuswamy
17. Kanusamy
18. Nallammal
19. Radha
20. Kannan
21. Bubathy
22. Malar
23. Banumathy
24. Shanthi
25. Marimuthu
26. Mariammal
27. Mathiazhagan
28. Dhanalakshmi
29. Pazhanimuthu
30. Selvarani
31. Maariyayi
32. Anjalai
33. Sathyavanimuthu
34. Maarimuthazh
35. S.Selvi
36. Periyasamy
37. Anjalai
38. Vasudevan
39. Manoransidan
40. Sumathi
41. Ponnusamy
42. Nedumaran
43. Saraswathi
44. Pushpa
45. Marudamuthu
46. Selamma
47. Govindarasupizhlai
48. Selvarani
49. Arokkia Samy
50. Selvakumar
51. Abbas
52. Rani
53. Jothimani
54. Asaithambi
55. Balaji
56. Pattu
57. Maharani
58. Sivakalai
59. Jayachandran
60. Vazhaipadi
61. Muthuraj
62. Omaantai
63. Ramayi
64. Baunambal
65. Lakshmi
66. Susila
67. Pazhaniammal
68. Chandira
69. Selvakumar
70. Saroja
71. Kalaiyarasan
72. Prabu
73. Natarajan
74. Manogaran
75. Periyasami
76. Chitra
77. Selvarasu
78. Azhagammal
79. Annadurai
80. Jaya
81. Periyasami
82. Sukbiraiya ..
Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the second respondent proceedings dated 13.09.2013 made in pursuant to Sa.Mu.Aa.6/623/2010 quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to select the Othiyam Village as real beneficiary as Othiyam Samathuvapuram Kudiiruppukal, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District.
For Petitioner :
No Appearance For Respondents :
Mr.T.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government Pleader for R1 to R7 R8 to R82 not ready in notice
ORDER
When the matter was listed for hearing on 13.04.2023, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Thus, this Court passed an order, directing the Registry to list the matter on 18.04.2023 under the caption "For Dismissal".
2. Even today, i.e. 18.04.2023, when the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. Thus, it is evident that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. Index : Yes/No 18.04.2023 drm To:
1. The Secretary to Government Rural Development and Local Administration Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai-600 009.
2. The Collector, Perambalur District.
3. The Assistant Planning Officer (Vi) (Ma) District Rural Development Agency, Perambalur District.
4. The Taluk Development (Taluk Panchayat) Officer Veppur, Kunnam Taluk
5. The Tahsildar (Reputed) Taluk Office, Kunnam Taluk ,Perambalur District.
6. The President The Village Panchayat Othiyam, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District.
7. The Village Administrative Officer Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District.
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
drm 18.04.2023