← Library
Madras High CourtWP/32173/2012dismissed as infructuous

P.Suntharavadivel v. The Commissioner

2024-03-12Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.03.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD P.Sunthara Vadivel

...Petitioner

-Vs1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Endowments Department, Uttamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 34.

2.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore - 18.

3.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Sangameswarar Thirukoil, Coimbatore - 641 001.

4.The Fit Person/Trust Board of Arulmigu Sangameswara Thirukoil, Coimbatore - 641 001.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the notification of the 3rd respondent dated 06.11.2012 and quash the same in so far as the calling for all applications for the post of 1/4

Ticket Seller in deviation to the conditions of approval granted by the 1st respondent dated 06.09.2012 made in Mu.Mu.No.41476/2012/H2 and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to absorb the petitioner for the post of Ticket Seller, as per the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 04.08.1995 made in Circular No.11/95 and pass such further orders. For Petitioner :

M/s.G.Thilakavathi Senior Counsel For R1 & R2 :

Mr.S.P.Karthik Government Advocate (HR & CE) For R3 & R4 :

Mr.R.Mahalingam

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 11.03.2024, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption "For Dismissal" on 12.03.2024.

2. Today, 12.03.2024, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (HR & CE) appearing for respondents 1 and 2, and the learned counsel appearing for respondents 3 and 4 are present in Court. 2/4

3. Learned Government Advocate (HR & CE) appearing for respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the petitioner has already been regularized and he has also sent a letter to withdraw the present writ petition.

4. In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (HR & CE), nothing survives in this writ petition for further adjudication.

5. In the result, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

12.03.2024 cda Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order 3/4

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

cda To 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Endowments Department, Uttamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 34.

2.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore - 18.

3.The Executive Officer, Arulmigu Sangameswarar Thirukoil, Coimbatore - 641 001.

4.The Fit Person/Trust Board of Arulmigu Sangameswara Thirukoil, Coimbatore - 641 001.

12.03.2024 4/4