Savithri v. Panchalai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 20.02.2020 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN CRP.(PD).No.4865 of 2013 and MP.No.1 of 2013 Savithri ... Petitioner
Versus
1.Panchalai 2.Arulmozhi ... Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 06.10.2012 made in I.A.No.631 of 2012 in O.S.No.180 of 2011 on the file of the Additional Sub-Court, Vridhachalam. For petitioner : Mr.R.Arundattan For Respondents: Mrs.R.Meenal
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the main suit in O.S.No.180 of 2011 has already been disposed of and he further stated that the present prayer in the Civil Revision Petition filed as against the order passed in I.A.No.163 of 2012 in O.S.No.180 of 2011 has become infructuous. To that effect, he also made an endorsement in the Court bundle. 2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
klt To The Additional Sub-Court, Vridhachalam.
+1 cc to M/s.R.Meenal, Advocate Sr.No. 14905 CRP.(PD).No.4865 of 2013 and MP.No.1 of 2013 RSV(CO) RMP(21/07/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/