Smt.Nachammal v. Muthulakshm

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.09.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR S.A. No. 1249 of 2012 and M.P. No. 1 of 2012 1.

Natchmmal 2.

Kamalathal 3.

P. Nataraj 4.

P. Subramaniam 5.

P. Eswaran 6.

P. Muthusamy ... Appellants Vs.

1.

Muthulakshmi 2.

S. Ravi 3.

The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by its The District Collector, Coimbatore (now Tiruppur) 4.

The Revenue Divisional Officer, RDO Office, Trippur.

5.

The Tahsildar, Tiruppur Taluk Office, Tiruppur.

1/4

6.

Vijayalakshmi 7.

Minor. Srikanth 8.

Minor. Raguprasath (The Respondents 7 & 8 minors rep. by Mother/ natural guardian/ Mrs. Vijayalakshmi/ 6th respondent) ... Respondents Second Appeal filed Under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.07.2012 made in A.S. No.90 of 2011 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Coimbatore reversing the finding of the Judgment and Decree dated 31.03.2011 made in O.S. No.52 of 2005 on the file of I Additional Sub-Judge, Tiruppur.

For Appellants :

No Appearance For Respondent 1 :

M/s. S. K. Rakhunathan For RR 2, 6 to 8 :

No Appearance For RR 3 to 5 :

Mr. T. Arunkumar (Additional Government Pleader) *****

JUDGMENT

There was no representation on behalf of appellants for the past hearing dates, hence this matter has been listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". 2/4

2.

Even today, there is no representation on behalf of appellants, therefore, this Court is inclined to dismiss this second appeal as default. 3.

Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed as default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. No costs. 30.09.2024 stn Index:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No To:

1. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

3/4

K. RAJASEKAR, J.

stn S.A. No. 1249 of 2012 30.09.2024 4/4