Madras High CourtWP/6419/2022disposed of

M.Dinesh Kumar Jain v. The Tahsildar

2022-04-04Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :04.04.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P. No.6419 & 6425 of 2022 1.M.Dinesh Kumar Jain 2.M.Praveen Kumar Jain 3.K.Madhu ... Petitioners in W.P.No.6419 of 2022 1.D.Anjana 2.P.Anju 3.K.Siddharth ... Petitioners in W.P.No.6425 of 2022 Vs.

The Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk, Chennai District.

Respondent in both W.Ps Prayer in W.P.No.6419 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue Joint Patta for the land measuring an extent of 8.487 cents in Old S.No.20 Part, New S.No.20/4 of Manjambakkam Village, formerly Ambattur Taluk, presently Madhavaram Taluk, Thiruvallur District by considering the first petitioner's application dated 15.06.2021. Prayer in W.P.No.6425 of 2022: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to issue joint patta for the land measuring an extent of 5.00 Cents in Old S.No.22/1 Part, New S.No.22/1 Part, 29.00 Cents in Old S.No.22/2 Part, New S.No.22/2A2, 24.87 cents in Old S.No.22/3 Part, New S.No.22/3A2 part, 26.

00 cents in Old S.No.22/4 part, New S.No.22/4B Part, 7.72 cents in Old S.No.23/1 part, new S.No.23/1B, 3.00 cents in old S.No.23/2, New No.23/2A2 part, totally 95.59 cents of Manjambakkam Village, formerly Ambattur Taluk, presently Madhavaram Taluk, Thiruvallur District by considering the first petitioner's application dated 15.06.2021.

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Ilaya Perumal (in both W.Ps) For Respondent : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan (in both W.Ps) Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

These Writ Petitions have been filed seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to issue joint patta for the petitioner's properties.

2. Today, when the matter is listed under the caption 'for reporting compliance', the learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the petitioners applications were rejected on the ground that the petitioners are not able to identify the boundaries of the land purchased by them in S.No.20 part, S.No.22/1, S.No.22/2A2, S.No.22/3A2, S.No.22/4B, S.No.23/1B and S.No.23/2A2 of Manjambakkam Village, Madhavaram Taluk, and the said portion of land purported to have been purchased by the petitioners in above said survey numbers is not peg-marked with boundary stones, fencing or compound wall. The learned counsel for the petitioner also ratifies the same.

3. Recording the submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader, no further adjudication is required in the present Writ Petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to work out their remedy in the manner known to law. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioners . No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar tri/jd

To The Tahsildar, Madhavaram Taluk, Chennai District.

+2cc to Mr.A.Ilaya Perumal, Advocate SR.No.22912, 22911 +1cc to the Government Pleader, SR.No.23658 W.P. No.6419 & 6425 of 2022 VBM(CO) CB(19/04/2022)