C.Jayakumar v. Chidambaram,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12-12-2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM A.S.No.353 of 2018 C.Jayakumar .. Appellant/Plaintiff vs.

1. Chidambaram

2. R.Kadhiravan .. Respondents/Defendants Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, read with Order 41, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.4 of 2011 on the file of the Hon'ble IInd Additional District Judge, Vellore dated 28.03.2018.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.U.Karunakaran for R1 Mr.K.Premkumar for R2

O R D E R

The first appeal was listed for the hearing on 10.12.2019. None appeared for the appellant. Thus, the case was directed to be listed under the caption "For Dismissal" on 11.12.2019. When the first appeal was taken up for hearing on 11.12.2019 and on that day also none appeared for the appellant. Thus, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter once again under the caption "For Dismissal" on 11.12.2019. When the case is taken up today i.e., on 12.12.2019, even today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

2. Thus, it is to be construed that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. Accordingly, the first https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Pkn TO 1.The IInd Additional District Judge, Vellore.

A.S.No.353 of 2018 PA(CO) GN(31/01/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/