Thiyagu @ Dhiyagu v. State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Second day of March Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.5147 of 2021 THIYAGU @ DHIYAGU [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANALURPET POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.
CR.NO.34 OF 2021.
For Petitioner : M/S.M.ILLIYAS Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest in connection with the case in Crime No.34 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police for the alleged offence u/s 379 of IPC, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The allegation is that the petitioner along with two others committed theft of poultry.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that stolen poultries were recovered and substantial investigation is over. He further submitted that there is no previous case reported against the petitioner.
5. Considering the nature of offence and the fact that the stolen properties were recovered and the other circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions :-
a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukoilur, Villupuram District, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:
[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks as and thereafter as and when required by the police for interrogation. [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate himself /Trial Court as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.
-sd/- 22/03/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUKOILUR, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VILLUPURAM [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANALURPET POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.
+1 CC to M/S.M.ILLIYAS Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.3873 CRL OP.5147/2021 Date :22/03/2021 cs 07/04/2021