Madras High CourtWP/12131/2015disposed of

S.Raju v. The Thasildar

2015-04-23Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.04.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.12131 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 S.Raju .. Petitioner - Vs -

1. The Tahsildar, Thirukovillur Taluk, Villupuram District.

2. K.Perumal .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of a joint patta No.667 for inclusion of the 2nd respondent passed by the 1st respondent on 19.03.2015 as illegal and quash the same.

Petitioner : Mr.G.Ranganathan For Respondent 1 : Mr.S.Pattabiraman Government Advocate

O R D E R

By consent, the writ petition is take up for final disposal.

2. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 20.03.2015, to the first respondent stating among other things that he is the absolute owner of the land measuring an extent of 1 acre comprised in Survey No.57/1C, 57/2A, 57/2D, 57/2B, 57/2E, 57/4B, 57/5 and 57/2H in Veerangipuram Village, Thirukovillur Taluk, Villupuram District. The petitioner further claims that the same was purchased by him vide registered Document No.853 of 2006 on the file of the Sub Registrar, Arangandanallur and that he is in absolute possession and enjoyment of the same. But the name of one Mr.K.Perumal has been included in the joint patta No.667 for the said property. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 20.03.2015 to the first respondent for rectification of the mistake by deleting the name of Mr.K.Perumal. Though it was acknowledged by the first respondent, no orders have been passed and hence the petitioner has come forward https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

with this writ petition.

3. Heard the submissions of Mr.G.Ranganathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Pattabiraman, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the first respondent.

4. Though the petitioner has sought for a larger relief, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into the merits, it would be suffice to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 20.03.2015, on merits and in accordance with law, after putting on notice the second respondent and pass orders as expeditiously as possible and not later than eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner as well as the second respondent. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kk To The Tahsildar, Thirukovillur Taluk, Villupuram District.

1 cc to Mr. G.Ranganathan,Advocate, SR.No.22242 1 cc to Government Pleader,Sr.No22371 W.P.No.12131 of 2015 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2015 rsy(co) pmk.20.5.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/