K.Chelladurai v. State Of Tamilnadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.02.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Petition No.32574 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 K.Chelladurai ... Petitioner Vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 09.

2.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3.The District Colletor, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupur, Tirupur District. ... Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order Se.Mu.No.4542/2012/a3/ dated 30.10.2012 issued by the fourth respondent and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently issue a direction to the respondents to grant all back wages, increments, eligible promotions, continuity of service and all other attendant Page No.1 of 4

benefits to the petitioner within a time frame, award costs. For Petitioner :

Mr.A.V.Raja For Respondents : M/s.N.Senthil Selvi, Government Advocate

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records relating to the order Se.Mu.No.4542/2012/a3/ dated 30.10.2012 issued by the fourth respondent and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently issue a direction to the respondents to grant all back wages, increments, eligible promotions, continuity of service and all other attendant benefits to the petitioner within a time frame, award costs.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief sought for in this writ petition has already been granted to the petitioner. Hence, he prayed this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle.

Page No.2 of 4

3. In view of the above submission coupled with an endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

22.02.2024 vm Index :

Yes/No Speaking Order :

Yes/No :

Yes/No To:

1.The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 09.

2.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3.The District Colletor, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupur, Tirupur District.

Page No.3 of 4

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

vm 22.02.2024 Page No.4 of 4