D.P. Sundararaj v. 1. The D.R.O.,Cum Addl.Dist.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.08.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P. No.3593 of 1999 D.P.Sundararaj ...

Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Revenue Officer-cum- Additional District Judge, Dindigul.

2. Revenue Court, Madurai

3. The Tenancy Tahsildar, Nilakottai.

4. S.Chinnasamy ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the first respondent in Na.Ka 29897/96/B-I dated 9.11.1998, quash the same.

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Jeevitha Ramani For 1 to 3 Respondents: Mr.M.Venugopal, Special Government Pleader For4th Respondent : Mr.S.Aaravindan

ORDER

It is represented by the counsels for the parties that the parties arrived at out of court settlement and as per the settlement, parties have agreed to withdraw the pending proceedings on the file of this Court. They seek permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Memo has been filed to that effect.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. In view of the memo filed by the learned counsels for both parties,the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Memo shall form part of the order.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar uma To

1. The District Revenue Officer-cum- Additional District Judge, Dindigul.

2. Revenue Court, Madurai

3. The Tenancy Tahsildar, Nilakottai.

W.P. No.3593 of 1999 ks(co) aa04/09 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/