← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/5337/2021granted

Ramesh v. The State Rep.By

2021-03-17Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.03.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.5337 of 2021

1. Ramesh ... Petitioners

2. Senthil Kumar

3. Sakthivel -VsThe State Rep. By ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, F4, Killiyanur Police Station, Villupuram District.

Crime No.Not known of 2021 Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest pending investigation in Crime No. Not known of 2021 under Section 354 of IPC on the file of the F4, Killiyanur Police Station, Villupuram District. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Swamichandran For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 354 of IPC, in Crime No. 72 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a family property dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, as a result of which, there was a wordy quarrel, the petitioners are said to have attacked the defacto complainant and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint was registered.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been

foisted against them. He would further submit that the petitioners have given a complaint before the respondent police in Crime No.73 of 2021 against the defacto complainant and it is a case in counter. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there is a case in counter case in Crime Nos. 72 and 73 of 2021 has been registered by the respondent police. He further submitted that there are no previous cases pending as against these petitioners. He would further submit that the injured person has been discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that it is a case in counter and the injured person has been discharged from the hospital, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur, on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which this petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation.

[c] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

7. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 17/03/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VANUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VILLUPURAM. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, F4, KILLIYANUR POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.

+1 CC to M/S.S.SWAMICHANDRAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.3545 CRL OP.5337/2021 Date :17/03/2021 TA-30/03/2021