← Library
Madras High CourtWP/32846/2012dismissed for nonprosecution

M.Rajeswari v. The District Collector

2024-02-12Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.02.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Writ Petition No.32846 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2012 M.Rajeswari ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

2.The Commissioner, Harur Panchayat Union, Dharmapuri District.

3.Mathammal ... Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in proceedings in Na.Ka.No.11393/2012/X1 dated .08.2012 signed by the first respondent on 21.08.2012 and quash the order appointing the third respondent therein and consequently direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner to the post of Noon Meal Organizer at Nammangadu Panchayat Union Elementary School, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District. For Petitioner :

No appearance Page No.1 of 4

For Respondent 1 :

Mr.M.Rajendiran, Additional Government Pleader For Respondent 2 :

Mr.N.Senthil Selvi, Government Advocate For Respondent 3 :

Mr.J.Pradeep

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records of the first respondent in proceedings in Na.Ka.No.11393/2012/X1 dated .08.2012 signed by the first respondent on 21.08.2012 and quash the order appointing the third respondent therein and consequently direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner to the post of Noon Meal Organizer at Nammangadu Panchayat Union Elementary School, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing on earlier occasion i.e., on 08.02.2024, none represented the petitioner. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the case on 12.02.2024 under the caption "For Dismissal". Page No.2 of 4

3. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it is crystal clear and evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case and this Court has no other option except to dismiss this writ petition for non prosecution.

4. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

12.02.2024 vm Index :

Yes/No Speaking Order :

Yes/No :

Yes/No To:

1.The District Collector, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri.

2.The Commissioner, Harur Panchayat Union, Dharmapuri District.

Page No.3 of 4

J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

vm 12.02.2024 Page No.4 of 4