Umapathy v. Sulochana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 04.02.2020 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN CRP.(PD).No.899 of 2013 and MP.No.1 of 2013 CRP.(PD).No.900 of 2013 Umapathy ... Petitioner (in both CRPs)

Versus

1.Sulochna 2.Balaji 3.Shanthi (died) 4.Anitha 5.Sailavasan 6.Gopinath ... Respondents (in both CRPs) Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal orders dated 24.09.2012 passed in I.A.No.199 of 2012 & I.A.No.198 of 2012 respectively in O.S.No.1 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ranipet, Vellore District. For petitioner : Ms.M.Tamil Thendral For Respondents: No Appearance

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner has reported that the sole petitioner is reported dead. Though sufficient opportunities were given to the petitioner's counsel, till date, no steps have been taken to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased. Hence, this Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as abated with liberty to move appropriate application, if the legal heirs of the petitioner warrants so to do. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. -s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar klt https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The District Munsif Court, Ranipet, Vellore District. 2.The Section Officer VR Section High Court, Madras CRP.(NPD).Nos.899 & 900 of 2013 MP.No.1 of 2013 rr(co) aa13/05/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/