M/S.M.S.Traders, v. State Of Tamil Nadu,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :22.10.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.2878 & 2879 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013 M/s.M.S.traders Rep. by its sole proprietor M.Mathiazhagan 38/5-2 Bazar Street, Kollumangudi Post and Town, Nannilam Taluk, Thiruvarur District.

..Petitioner in WP.No.2878/2013 V.Veldevi & Co., rep by its Sole Proprietor, Mrs.V.Veldevi, W/o.Venkatrajan, 23A, Thiurmanjana Veedi, Koorainadu, Mayiladuthurai.

.. Petitioner in WP.No.2879/2013 vs

1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Agricultural Department Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2. The Tamil Nadu State, Agricultural Marketing Board Rep. by its Commissioner Agricultural Department Marketing Committee, Guindy, Chennai-32.

...Respondent 1 & 2

in both WP.Nos.2878 & 2879/13

3. Thiruvarur Agricultural Marketing Committee Rep. by its secretary Thiruvarur.

...3rd Respondent in WP.No.2878/13

4. The Superintendent, Agricultural Marketing Committee, Poonthottam, Thiruvarur district.

... 4th Respondent in WP.2878/13

5. Mayiladuthurai Agricultural Marketing Committee Rep. by its Secretary, Mayiladuthurai. ...3rd Respondent in WP.No.2879/13 6.The Superintendent, Agricultural Marketing Committee, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.

...4th Respondent in WP.No.2879/13 Prayer in both Petitions: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from enforcing the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulations) Act 1987 and the Rules made there under or Byelaws by any Marketing Committee in respect of purchase of any notified agricultural produce effected outside the notified market area and sold inside or outside issued in the Government Gazatte in G.O.Ms.No.3 & 4 dated 3.1.2003 issued by the 1st respondent the market area For Petitioner : Mr.R.T.Shyamala in both petitions For Respondents : Mr.R.S.Selvam Government Advocate for R1,R2 & R4 Mr.S.Saravanan for R3 in both petitions C O M M O N O R D E R Based on the oral submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner to withdraw the petition, this Courts has granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Agricultural Department Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2. The Tamil Nadu State, Agricultural Marketing Board Rep. by its Commissioner Agricultural Department Marketing Committee, Guindy, Chennai-32.

3. Thiruvarur Agricultural Marketing Committee Rep. by its secretary Thiruvarur.

4. The Superintendent, Agricultural Marketing Committee, Poonthottam, Thiruvarur district.

5. The Secretary, Mayiladuthurai Agricultural Marketing Committee, Mayiladuthurai.

6.The Superintendent, Agricultural Marketing Committee, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.

+2cc to Mr.S.Saravanan, Advocate, S.R.No.71839 & 71840 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.72011 W.P.No.2878 & 2879 of 2013 RJI(CO) GSP(19/11/2018)