Sakunthala Govindan, v. The Regional Provident Fund

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.04.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.No.28890 of 2013 Sakunthala Govindan

...Petitioner

-Vs1.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, No.37, P.H. Road, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014.

2.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), S.A.O. Ambattur.

...Respondents

PRAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent herein relating to the P.P.O. No.TN/AMB/Pension/04 dated 15.04.2004 of the petitioner and quash the same as illegal and direct the 2nd respondent to issue a revised and correct P.P.O. as prayed for in the accompanying affidavit.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Ms.Sunitha Kumari, Standing Counsel

ORDER

Since there was no representation for the petitioner on 18.02.2022 and 25.03.2022, the matter was listed under the caption "for dismissal". Thereafter, on 05.04.2022. the learned counsel for the petitioner had appeared and at his request, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

matter was adjourned. Even today, when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for default. No costs. s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar hvk To 1.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, No.37, P.H. Road, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014.

2.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), S.A.O. Ambattur.

+1 CC to Ms.Sunitha Kumari, Advocate sr 25228. W.P.No.28890 of 2013 AJS(CO) SP(25/04/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/