Madras High CourtWP/1160/2014disposed of

K.Vinod Kumar, v. The Tahshildar

2018-08-20Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.08.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.1160 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 K.Vinod Kumar ... Petitioner Vs The Tahsildar, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District.

... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondent herein to consider the representation dated 23.08.2013 (requesting them to conduct enquiry and cancel the patta issued in the name of Shanker and thereafter issue patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of S.No.104/1A, measuring an extent of 2700 Sq.ft out of 5790 Sq.ft) within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Krishnan For Respondent : Mr.J.Ramesh, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking adirection to the respondent herein to consider his representation dated 23.08.2013 to conduct enquiry, cancel the patta issued earlier and issue patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of S.No.104/1A, measuring an extent of 2700 Sq.ft out of 5790 Sq.ft.

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted a representation claiming the same relief as prayed in this writ petition, but, the said representation is yet to be disposed of by the respondent. However, the learned counsel submitted that it would suffice, if the representation dated 23.08.2013 made by the petitioner is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

directed to be considered by the respondent, on merits.

3. Mr.J.Ramesh, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.08.2013 and pass orders in accordance with law.

4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, this Court directs the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.08.2013 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.57673. gsk To The Tahsildar, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram District.

W.P.No.1160 of 2014 GP(CO) rrs 25/09/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/