← Library
Madras High CourtWP/1162/2014disposed of

S.Krishnamoorthy v. The Thasildhar

2018-08-20Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.08.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.1162 of 2014 S.Krishnamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Mambalam Guindy Taluk, Chennai.

2.The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Rep by its Chairman, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Triplicane, Chennai-5.

... Respondents R2 impleaded as per order dated 06.02.2014 in M.P.No.1 of 2014 in W.P.No.1162 of 2014 PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.06.2013 and the same was received by them on 12.06.2013. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Divakaran For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

The petitioner has come up with this writ petition seeking a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 06.06.2013, to issue patta in favour of the petitioner to the land in Survey No.4828/3 at Door No.12 & 13, Gangai Karai Puram, Prakasam Mudali Street, Chennai-17.

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner has submitted a representation claiming the same relief as prayed in this writ petition, but, the said representation is yet to be disposed of by the first respondent. However, the learned counsel submitted that it would suffice, if the representation dated 06.06.2013 made by the petitioner is directed to be considered by the first respondent, on merits.

3. Mr.J.Ramesh, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, submitted that the first https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.06.2013 and pass orders in accordance with law.

4. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, this Court directs the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 06.06.2013 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any of the interested parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/-- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gsk To 1.The Tahsildar, Mambalam Guindy Taluk, Chennai.

2.The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Rep by its Chairman, No.5, Kamarajar Salai, Triplicane, Chennai-5.

+1cc to Government Pleader SR.NO.57205 sm:26.9.2018 W.P.No.1162 of 2014 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/