← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/4850/2023granted

Ravindra Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-03-06Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira7 pages

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(aaa) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 in Crime No.43 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were in illegal possession of 240 bottles of liquor (120 No's of 'Jhonston Wine' (750ml) brandy liquor bottles, 48 No's of Jacob's Creek (Red Wine) (750 ml) liquor bottles, 24 No's of Jacob's Creek (White Wine) (750 ml) liquor bottles, 24 No's of 'Ti Amo Wine' (750 ml) liquor bottles and 24 No's of 'Teachr's Highland Cream (1000 ml) liquor bottles. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case based on

the confession statement of the co-accused. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He would also submit that without prejudice, the petitioner is prepared to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- to any Welfare Scheme of the Government and he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent would submit that the petitioner along with other accused were in illegal possession of 240 bottles of liquor (120 No's of 'Jhonston Wine' (750ml) brandy liquor bottles, 48 No's of Jacob's Creek (Red Wine) (750 ml) liquor bottles, 24 No's of Jacob's Creek (White Wine) (750 ml) liquor bottles, 24 No's of 'Ti Amo Wine' (750 ml) liquor bottles and 24 No's of 'Teachr's Highland Cream (1000 ml) liquor bottles. He would further submit that there is no previous case pending as against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that without prejudice to his contention and defence the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit an amount of Rs.25,000/- to any welfare scheme run by the Government.

6. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

7. Taking into consideration the voluntary submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to the credit of the Dean, Rajiv Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court.

8. Merely, because the petitioner deposits the said amount, it would not amount to admission of his guilt. Therefore, it is open to the trial Court to deal with the case independently.

9. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case,

the submissions made on both sides and also taking note of the fact that the petitioner has come forward to deposit an amount of Rs.25,000/- to the Dean, Rajiv Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Chennai bearing A/c. No.10273425961, IFSC Code SBIN0001856, State Bank of India, Park Town Branch, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

10. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) directly to the Dean, Rajiv Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Chennai and on such deposit and on receipt of proof of payment, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) directly to the Dean, Rajiv Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, to enable the Dean to use the aforesaid amount for the purpose of treating the alcohol influenced patients.

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid

conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. 06.03.2023 jas

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

jas 06.03.2023