Kandasamy v. Santhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.03.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR 1.Kandasamy 2.Velusamy 3.Raju @ Rajendiran ... Petitioners vs.

1.Santhi Sengodan (deceased) 2.Kandsamy 3.Kuppusamy 4.Krishnan 5.Chenniappan 6.Sekar 7.Palaniappan 8.Gurusamy 9.Pavayee 10.Sengodan Kandasamy (died) 11.Palaniappan 12.Thangammal 13.The Competent Authority and Special D.R.O. (L.A.), N.H.46-47, Krishnagiri and Salem, Krishnagiri.

14.Sellammal 15.Suseela ... Respondents 1/4

Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the docket order in O.S.No.170 of 2010, dated 09.01.2019 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sangagiri. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Rajmakesh For Respondents : No Appearance for R1 and R3 R2-Not ready in notice R4 to R15 - Give up

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the main suit is already disposed on 08.04.2021 itself. Therefore, the prayer sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the said statement of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. 15.03.2024 Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No : Yes / No ub 2/4

To The Subordinate Judge, Sangagiri.

3/4

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

ub 15.03.2024 4/4