Subramani v. The City Police Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.6688 of 2025

1. Subramani

2. Jeeva @ Srinivasan

3. Thangaraj

4. Vinoth Kumar ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The City Police Commissioner, Salem City Police Commissioner Office, Salem City, Salem District.

2. The Deputy Police Commissioner, Salem City Deputy Police Commissioner Office, Salem City, Salem District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Ammapettai Police Station, Salem District.

... Respondents Prayer : The Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners by considering their representation dated 31.12.2024 and 15.02.2025.

For Petitioners : Mr.C.R.Gokulvisvas 1/4

For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents not to harass the petitioners by considering their representation dated 31.12.2024 and 15.02.2025.

2. When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police on getting instructions submits that since the petitioners were involved in the lottery ticket business, they were called for enquiry. Now, they were not required for enquiry.

3. Recording the said submissions, this petition is closed. No costs. 25.02.2025 Vv To 2/4

1. The City Police Commissioner, Salem City Police Commissioner Office, Salem City, Salem District.

2. The Deputy Police Commissioner, Salem City Deputy Police Commissioner Office, Salem City, Salem District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Ammapettai Police Station, Salem District.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

3/4

Vv W.P.No.6688 of 2025 25.02.2025 4/4