S.V. Duraisamy v. The Sub Registrar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.03.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Writ Appeal No.884 of 2024 S.V.Duraisamy ... Appellant Vs.

1.The Sub-Registrar, Achirapakkam SRO, Chengalpattu District.

2.S.Hakeem Raja ... Respondents Prayer:Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 12.12.2023 in W.P.No.34243/2023.

For Appellant : Mr.G.Mageshkumar For R1 : Mr.P.Anandakumar Government Advocate For R2 : Not ready in notice Page No.1 of 4

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The Writ Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that the appellant has failed to produce the original Title documents and certified copy of the DTCP approval, in compliance with Rule 55-A of the Registration Rules.

2.

In the absence of original, the guidelines issued under proviso clause are to be adopted. The appellant has filed an affidavit stating that he will produce a certified copy of the DTCP approval before the Registering Officer for verification.

3.

In view of the fact that the appellant undertakes that he will produce the original Title Deeds and certified copy of the DTCP approval, no further adjudication is required. On such production, the Registering Officer shall verify the same and proceed with the registration by following the procedures.

Page No.2 of 4

4.

With these observations, the Writ Appeal stands disposed of. No costs.

[S.M.S.J.] [K.R.S.J.] 26.03.2024 Index :

Yes/No Speaking Order :

Yes/No :

Yes/No veda To 1.The Sub-Registrar, Achirapakkam SRO, Chengalpattu District.

Page No.3 of 4

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.

AND K.RAJASEKAR,J.

veda Judgment in 26.03.2024 Page No.4 of 4