Madras High CourtCONT P/582/2015closed

G.Kumaresan v. Hans Raj Veerma Ias

2015-03-23Honourable Mr Justice V. Ramasubramanian3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.3.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN Contempt Petition No.582 of 2015 Excel Engineering Enterprises No.63, Tamaraikulam Elagiri Post, Jolarpettai, Vellore District rep. by its Proprietor G.Kumaresan.

Petitioner Vs.

1. Hans Raj Veerma, IAS State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Environment and Forests (EC2) Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.

2. Vinoth Kumar, IFS Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (HOFF) Panagal Building, Chennai - 600 015.

3. Sudhansu Gupta, IFS Chief Conservator of Forests Planning and Development Panagal Building, Chennai 15.

4. K.Selvaraj District Forest Officer Thirupattur Forest Division Thirupattur, Vellore District.

5. Sampath Forest Contractor, Near Santhai Maithanam Alangayam, Vaniyambadi Taluk Vellore District.

6. Gunasekaran Forest Contractor, Periyakasinaickenpatti Koratti, Thirupattur Taluk Vellore District.

Respondents

----- Petition against the wilful disobedience of the order dated 02.3.2015 made in W.P.No.32111 of 2014. ----- For Petitioner :Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondents 1-4 :Mr.P.H.Arvind Pandian, Addl.A.G.

For Mr.M.K.Subramanian, Spl.GP(F) For Respondent-5 :No appearance For Respondent-6 :Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Mr.G.B.Saravana Bhavan -----

O R D E R

This contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 02.3.2015 made in W.P.No.32111 of 2014.

2. In pursuance of the orders passed on 16.3.2015, the measurement of the work so far carried out, has already been taken and a report is filed by the Executive Engineer of Public Works Department before Court.

3. It is stated by Mr.S.Doraisamy, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no dispute with regard to the contents of the report filed today. The petitioner is also present in Court and he agrees.

4. Now what remains to be done is to put up the works which have not yet commenced and works which remain incomplete, for tender. In view of the fact that the money has been retained by the fourth respondents, the respondents 1 to 4 shall proceed with initiating the tender process as per the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender Rules, 2000. The petitioner should also be permitted to participate in the tender and the respondent shall proceed

strictly in accordance with law. With the above direction, the contempt shall stand closed. The respondents shall file compliance report after one month.

Kpl SD/ DEPUTY REGISTRAR(CLAA) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2015. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

SS/CO/20/02/2015 One CC to M/s.G.B.Saravanabhavan, Advocate, SR.4330 To