Central Provident Fund Commissioner v. K.Natarajan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.07.2020 CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY C.M.P.No.6179 of 2020 in W.A.No. SR 28717 of 2020 1 THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT GOVT. OF INDIA, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN 14 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI-110 066 2 THE ADDITIONAL CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER HQ (PENSION) EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN 14 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI-110 066 3 THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-I (PENSION) EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAWAN 14 BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI-110 066 4 THE ADDITIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION 37, ROYAPETTAH HIGH ROAD CHENNAI - 600 014.
5 THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, 37, ROYAPETTAH HIGH ROAD, CHENNAI - 600 014.
... Petitioners Vs
1.K.NATARAJAN 2.T.RAMASAMY 3.K.BALASUBRAMANIAM 4.K.PERUMAL 5.R.MALLIGA 6.N.THIMMAPPAN 7.M.ARUMUGAM 8.K.BHEEMAN 9.S.NARAYANAN 10.P.GOVINDAN 11.V.CHINNASAMY 12.T.KONDRI GOUNDER 13.P.MANIKAM 14.B.VENKATESAN 15.N.VENKATACHALAM 16.M.NARAYANAN 17.GUNALAN 18.M.MURUGAN 19.R.SADANANDHAN 20.R.MANOHARAN 21.V.CHINNA THAMBI 22.C.JAGANATHAN 23.UNION OF INDIA REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN, RAFI MARG NEW DELHI - 110 001 24.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR TAMIL NADU CIVI SUPPLIES CORPORATION 12, THAMBUSAMY ROAD, KILPAUK, CHENNAI - 600 010 25.THE MANAGING TRUSTEE, TNCSC EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTORY PROVIDENT FUND TRUST, TAMIL NADU CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION 12, THAMBUSAMY ROAD, KILPAUK CHENNAI - 600 010.
... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 282 days in preferring the appeal in W.A. SR No.28717 of 2020.
For Petitioners : Mr.Kunjithapatam Ramu For Respondents : Mr.Arun Dhanapalan for respondent Nos.1 to 22
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) We have heard Mr.Kunjithapatam Ramu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Arun Dhanapalan, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 22.
2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are satisfied that the delay has been sufficiently explained. The delay is, accordingly, condoned.
3. The Writ Appeal shall be treated to be within time and shall be given the regular number and tagged along with W.A.No.3501 of 2019. (A.P.S., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.) 28.07.2020 bbr
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
bbr C.M.P.No.6179 of 2020 in W.A.No. SR 28717 of 2020 28.07.2020