Perumal v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Eighteenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.6325 of 2022 PERUMAL [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMBUR TALUK POLICE STATION, AMBUR, THIRUPPATHUR DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.68 OF 2022.

For Petitioner : M/S.M.KALAIYARASAN Advocate For Respondent : Mrs.G.V.KASTHURI, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested on 07.02.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 354(A), 376, 511 of IPC, in Crime No.68 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The allegation made against the petitioner is that on 07.02.2022 at mid night, the petitioner knocked the door of the defacto complainant who is a deaf and dumb girl who has no parents and relatives. When she opened the door, petitioner barged into the house and attempted to rape her. Since, she was deaf and dumb, she could not inform this to anyone immediately and later she informed this incident to her cousin brother viz., Babu who is working in Bangalore. He told her that he would come after one week and the complaint was given on 17.02.2022.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity. He is judicial custody from 17.02.2022. 4.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor strongly opposed this petition on the ground that the petitioner attempted to commit rape on a deaf and dumb girl.

5.

Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor for the respondent Police.

6.

The allegation against the petitioner is very serious in the sense that he said to have attempted to rape a deaf and dumb girl, who has no parents and relatives and helpless and hapless. Petitioner is not able to give details as to the alleged previous enmity between the defacto complainant and the petitioner. 7.

Considering the seriousness of the allegations made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 18/03/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMBUR TALUK POLICE STATION, AMBUR, THIRUPPATHUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, VELLORE.

CC to M/S.M.KALAIYARASAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.6325/2022 Date :18/03/2022 TA-24/03/2022