M/S.Psvcpl-Bbipl-(Jv), Rep. By v. The Salem City Municipal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.08.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P.Nos.29223 & 29224 of 2013 M/s.PSVCPL-BBIPL-(JV), Rep. by authorised signatory M.V.Badarinarayana Plot No.15, Bungalow No.10, Street No.1A, Czech Colony, Sanath Nagar, Hyderabad-18.
... petitioner in both W.Ps.
vs
1. The Salem City Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Salem.
2. The Commissioner, Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem.
... Respondents in both W.Ps.
Prayer in both W.Ps.: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to forthwith dispose of the representation of the petitioners' bearing No.PSVCPL/ Salem UGSS/2013 dated 05.10.2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.Kandhan Duraisamy in both W.Ps.
For Respondents: Mr.P.V.Selvakumar in both W.Ps.
COMMON ORDER These writ petitions are heard through Videoconferencing, on account of the COVID-19 pandemic situation.
2.
These writ petitions are filed seeking a mandamus directing the respondents herein to consider the representation of the petitioners' dated 05.10.2013.
3.
The petitioner in both the writ petitions is the contractor, who had entered into the contracts with the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
respondent-Corporation and for various reasons it is stated that the contracts were terminated, and hence representations were given by the petitioners to reconsider the termination of the contracts. As they were delayed, the above writ petitions came to be filed.
4.
Heard the learned counsel appearing on both sides and perused the materials available on record.
5.
Pending the writ petitions there was a direction from this Court to the Corporation also to settle the dues to the petitioners for the work done. It is also represented now by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the said order was complied with and subsequent to the filing of these writ petitions, the works itself were given to another contractor. Since the works were entrusted to the subsequent contractor, the question of reconsideration of the representation does not arise. 6.
In view of the above, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gg/rsi To
1. The Salem City Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Salem.
2. The Commissioner, Salem City Municipal Corporation, Salem.
W.P.Nos.29223 & 29224 of 2013 spd[co] srg 01/10/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/