← Library
Madras High CourtCS/46/2025disposed of

B. Lalithkumar And Another v. P.C. Vedagiri And 5 Others

2026-06-05Honourable Mr.Justice K.Kumaresh Babu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

1. B. Lalithkumar and another S/o.Bhawarlal Jain, Door.No-49/1 and 2, Ramanuja Iyer St, Old Washermenpet, Ch-21

2. P.Dharmalingam S/o. Periyasamy, 61/63/3, Thandavarayan Gramani St, Todiarpet, Ch-81 ..Plaintiff(s) Vs

1. P.C. Vedagiri S/o.Late.P.R.Chittibabu Mudaliar

2. K.Sanjeeth Kumar S/o.Late.P.V.Kumar

3. K.Tharunika D/o.Late.P.V.Kumar

4. R.Harinath S/o.Late.P.V.Kumar

5. Mrs.Vasuki Kumar W/o.Late.P.V.Kumar

6. Mrs.R.Mala W/o.Late.P.V.Kumar ..Defendant(s) Prayer : Civil Suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of CPC read with Order IV Rule 1 of of Original Side Rules to grant a decree and judgment:-

a) granting a relief of specific performance of the agreements for sale dated 20.05.2024 and 18.08.2024 executed by the defendants 1 to 6, by directing the Defendants 1 to 6, to execute and register the sale deed in favour of the Plaintiffs or their nominees and in default the sale deed be executed and registered by an officer of this Hon'ble court in favour of the Plaintiffs or their nominees, for the suit property b) for the cost of this suit For Plaintiff(s):

Mr. V. Premkumar For Defendant(s):

Mr.Balakrishnan for DD1 to 6

JUDGMENT

In a suit for specific performance, the learned counsels appearing on either side would submit in unison that the parties to the Suit have reached an understanding and had entered into a Joint Memo of Compromise and the same is placed before this Court. The first defendant is present through video conferencing and had been identified by the learned counsel appearing for him and the defendants 2 to 6 are present before this Court.

2. In the said Joint Memo of compromise the defendants had agreed to execute the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff in respect of scheduled B & C on the terms as indicated therein.

3. Recording the said Joint Memo of Compromise, the suit stands disposed of on the said terms as being settled out of the Court. The said Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part of this judgment. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, no further adjudication is required to be made in the suit and accordingly the suit stands disposed of as settled out of Court.

4. Registry is directed to refund the Court fee as applicable. 05-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GBA

K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

GBA 05-06-2026