← Library
Madras High CourtWP/20853/2017disposed of

T.Revathy v. The Commissioner

2017-08-04Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah,Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira3 pages

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated 04.08.2017 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice R.SUBBIAH AND The Honourable Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA W.P.No.20853 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.21714 of 2017 T.Revathy .. Petitioner ..vs..

1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai-600 008.

2.The Executive Engineer, Corporation of Chennai, Zone-VI, No.5, Anderson Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai-23.

3.The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9. .. Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 and 2 from initiating any coercive action of locking and sealing and demolition action with regard to the building put up at New No.2, Old No.37, Rajavelu Street, Perambur, Chennai-11, pending determination of Section 80-A revision petition under Town and Country Planning Act, dated 09.06.2017 with the Government.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Mohan For Respondents : Mr.R.Arunmozhi (For R1 & R2) Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi, AGP (For R3) * * * * *

JUDGMENT

(Order of the Court was made by R. SUBBIAH, J.,) Mr.R.Arunmozhi, learned standing counsel takes notice for the respondents 1 & 2. Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice for for the 3rd respondent. 2.The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 & 2 from initiating any coercive action of locking and sealing and demolition action with regard to the building put up atNew No.2, Old No.37, Rajavelu Street, Perambur, Chennai-11, pending determination of the revision petition filed by the petitioner dated 09.06.2017 before 3rd respondent, under Section 80-A of the Town and Country Planning Act. 3.It stated by the petitioner that he is the owner of the subject property.

He claims that the building in the subject property was constructed after obtaining necessary planning permission from the Corporation of Chennai. However, alleging violation in the building plan, the Corporation authorities issued Notice dated 26.05.2017 to lock and seal the premises. Assailing the same, the petitioner preferred a special revision along with a stay petition, under Section 80A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act on 09.06.2017 before the 3rd respondent and the same is pending consideration. Apprehending that the respondents would initiate coercive action, the present writ petition is filed by the petitioner.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, We direct the 3rd respondent to consider the revision and the stay petition filed by the petitioner on 09.06.2017 and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till the disposal of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent authorities.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssv Copy to 1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai-600 008.

2.The Executive Engineer, Corporation of Chennai, Zone-VI, No.5, Anderson Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai-23.

3. The Secretary to Government The Government of Tamil Nadu Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.

+1 cc to M/s.R.Mohan Advocate sr 55902 +1 cc to M/s.A.Nagarajan Advocate sr 56041 +1 cc to the Government Pleader sr 56443 W.P.No.20853 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.21714 of 2017 ks(co) aa30/08/2017