Madras High CourtWP/3567/2018closed

A.Mohamed Sultan Sahib, v. The Principal Secretary To

2020-03-16Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.03.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P No.3567 of 2018 A.Mohamed Sultan Sahib Petitioners vs.

1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Adi Dravida Welfare Department, Fort St. George,

2. The District Collector, Collectorate, Dharmapuri District - 636 705.

3. The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition Officer-cum- Adidravidar Welfare, Dharmapuri - 636 701.

4. The Chief Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu,

5. The Secretary, Revenue Disaster Management,

6. The Secretary, Industries Department,

7. The Secretary, Highways and Minor Ports Department,

8. The Secretary, Housing & Urban Development Department,

9. The Secretary, Finance Department,

10. The Secretary, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Respondents [ R4 to R10 impleaded vide this Court Order dated 15.03.2018] Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner representation dated 29.12.2017 and direct the respondents to deposit Award amount with interest till date in C.M.A.(LA) No.49 of 2004 before the Sub Court, Dharmapuri. For Petitioner : M/s.V.R.Annagandhi For Respondents: Mr.D.Raja Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R10

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to deposit the Award amount with interest before the Sub Court, Dharmapuri. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 3.It is seen from the records that the compensation amount was a subject matter of challenge in this Court in S.A.No.784 of 2018. This Court passed final orders in the said Second Appeal on 10.12.2018. This Court confirmed the compensation that was fixed in favour of the petitioner and directed the respondents to deposit the same within a period of six weeks and consequently, the appeal was also dismissed. 4.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, pursuant to the directions given by the Division Bench of this Court, the compensation amount was deposited by the respondents and the petitioner has withdrawn the same.

5.In view of the above development, nothing survives in this petition and the same is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(ADI (MDU) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssr