← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/5216/2025granted

Vignesh v. State, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

2025-02-26Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.02.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Vignesh ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Uthukuli Police Station, Tiruppur District.

(Crime No.575 of 2024).

... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.575 of 2024, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vijaya Ragavan For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 16.12.2024 seeking bail in Crime No.575 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 308(4) of BNS, 2023 ( Corresponding Section 386 of IPC) 1/5

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner alleged to have committed theft of the defacto complainant's mobile phone. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that, petitioner is in custody from 16.12.2024 and since further custody is not required, the petitioner may be released on bail.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the investigation completed and final report also filed before the trial Court.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering, the nature of allegation; period of incarceration; final report has been filed and since further custody of the petitioner is not required, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 2/5

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthukuli, Tiruppur District. [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the trial Court on all working day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down 3/5

by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

26.02.2025 Sma To 1.District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthukuli, Tiruppur District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Uthukuli Police Station, Tiruppur District.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/5

SUNDER MOHAN., J.

Sma 26.02.2025 5/5