← Library
Madras High CourtWA/2140/2021disposed of

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/S.Spi Technologies India Pvt Ltd

2023-01-24Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan,Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad2 pages

W.A.No.2140 of 2021 W.A.No.2140 of 2021 & C.M.P.No.13539 of 2021 S.VAIDYANATHAN,J., AND J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J., This Writ Appeal has been listed today under the caption "For Clarification" at the instance of the learned counsel for the Respondent / Management.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the Respondent / Management that the amount so deposited is lying in the credit of this Court and not with the Tribunal and therefore, the Paragraph No.8 of the judgment dated 24.01.2023 requires necessary modification.

3. Learned Standing Counsel representing Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) has not refuted the above submission of the learned counsel for the Management.

4. In view of the afore-stated position, the Paragraph No.8 of the judgment dated 24.01.2023 is modified to the effect that the amount lying in deposit shall be directly S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.

and 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.A.No.2140 of 2021 J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

ar sent to the EPFO on furnishing the Account Number to which the amount shall be credited. The amount shall be transferred within 15 days from the date of request to be made either by the Management or EPFO. It is made clear that the amount shall have to be transferred together with accrued interest, if any. [S.V.N., J.] [J.S.N.P., J.] 13.03.2023 ar W.A.No.2140 of 2021 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis