T.Rajendran v. The Inspector General Of
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.03.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ W.P.NOS.29760 & 28254 OF 2013 AND M.P.NOS.1 & 2 OF 2013 W.P.NO.29760 OF 2013 T.Rajendran ... Petitioner .Vs.
1. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai - 600 028.
2. The District Registrar, Cuddalore.
3. The Sub-Registrar, ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the order passed by the 2nd respondent in No.3228/Vu/2013 dated 21.10.2013 and the consequential order passed by the 3rd respondent in No.213/2013 dated 29.10.2013, suspending the Licence No.A.795/A/91 issued to the petitioner as Document writer for a period of six months and quash the same. W.P.NO.28254 OF 2013 V.Gnanasekaran ... Petitioners .Vs.
1. The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai - 600 028.
2. The District Registrar, Tindivanam.
3. The Sub-Registrar, ... Respondents PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.3585/B2/2013 dated 30.09.2013 and the consequential order passed by the 3rd respondent in Na.Ka.No.210/2013 dated 01.10.2013, suspending the licence in Licence No.C 40/TVM issued to the petitioner as Document Writer for a period of three months and quash the same.
For Petitioner :
Mr.M.Prabaharan in both W.P's For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja in both W.P's Government Advocate COMMON ORDER The petitioners are challenging the impugned orders passed by the second respondent that the temporary suspension of their state licence as Document Writer.
2. The impugned orders dated 21.10.2013 and 30.09.2013 respectively and consequential orders passed by the third respondent dated 29.10.2013 and 01.10.2013 respectively.
3. By this time, the suspension period of six months and three months respectively has lapsed.
4. I find there is nothing survives for further adjudication in these writ petitions.
5. In view of the above, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. However, a liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the respondents if they have any further grievances.
No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssi/dua To 1.
The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome, Chennai - 600 028.
2.
The District Registrar, Cuddalore.
3.
The Sub-Registrar, 4.
The District Registrar, Tindivanam.
+2ccs to Mr.M.Prabaharan, Advocate, S.R.Nos.13683 & 13684 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.Nos.14647 & 14648 W.P.NOS.29760 & 28254 OF 2013 SSV(CO) PBS/18/03/2022