← Library
Madras High CourtWP/9680/2018withdrawn dismissed

Plus Max Duty Free Group-India v. Airport Authority Of India,

2019-07-05Honourable Mr Justice P.D.Audikesavalu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :05.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU W.P. No.9680 of 2018 and W.M.P. Nos.11583 & 32365 of 2018 Plus Max Duty Free Group-India Registered Office at Door No.86/18, Royal Complex, Seetharampalayam, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District - 637 209, Represented by its Manager Saravanan Subramani ... Petitioner -vs1.Airport Authority of India, Rep by its Executive Director (Commercial), Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi -110 003.

2.Airport Authority of India, Rep by its General Manager (Commercial), Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi -110 003.

3.Airports Authority of India, Rep by its Regional Executive Director, Office of Regional Executive Director, Operational Offices, Southern Region, Chennai - 600 027.

4.The Joint General Manager (Comml)/SR, Directorate of Commercial Regional Head Quarters, Southern Region, Chennai Airport, Chennai -27. 5.Airports Authority of India, Coimbatore International Airport, Rep by its Director, Coimbatore.

6.Airports Authority of India, Madurai International Airport, Rep by its Director, Madurai.

7.Airports Authority of India, Thiruvanandapuram International Airport, Rep by its Director, Thiruvananthapuram.

8.Airports Authority of India, Visakapatnam International Airport, Rep by its Director, Visakapatnam.

9.Airports Authority of India, Pune International Airport, Rep by is Director, Pune.

... Respondents Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents from taking any coercive or other actions against the Petitioner Duty Free Shops for non-implementation Electronic Point of Sale as referred in Clauses 3.1, 10.7, 10.7.3(a), (f) & (g) of Concession of Agreements till the issue between the Petitioner and the Respondents is referred to the Arbitration as requested by the Petitioner.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondents:

Ms.A.Arulmary

O R D E R

It is represented by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the matter in dispute in the Writ Petition has been settled between the parties. In such circumstances, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect, which is recorded. 2.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rkp

To 1.The Executive Director (Commercial), Airport Authority of India, Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi -110 003.

2. The General Manager (Commercial), Airport Authority of India, Rajiv Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi -110 003.

3.The Regional Executive Director, Airports Authority of India, Office of Regional Executive Director, Operational Offices, Southern Region, Chennai - 600 027.

4.The Joint General Manager (Comml)/SR, Directorate of Commercial Regional Head Quarters, Southern Region, Chennai Airport, Chennai -27.

5.The Director, Airports Authority of India, Coimbatore International Airport, Coimbatore.

6.The Director, Airports Authority of India, Madurai International Airport, Madurai.

7.The Director, Airports Authority of India, Thiruvanandapuram International Airport, Thiruvananthapuram.

8.The Director, Airports Authority of India, Visakapatnam International Airport, Visakapatnam.

9.The Director, Airports Authority of India, Pune International Airport, Pune.

+1cc to M/s. Father Xavier Associates, Advocate, S.R.No.56404 W.P. No.9680 of 2018 RSV(CO) RRS(22/08/2019)