Madras High CourtSA/637/2012dismissed for default

Chinnathambi v. Marimuthu

2021-11-29Honourable Mr Justice Rmt. Teekaa Raman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN S.A.NO.637 OF 2012 Chinnathambi ... Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.

1.Marimuthu 2.Anbalagan 3.Senthilkumar 4.Natarajan 5.Arunachalam ... Respondents/Defendants PRAYER:

This Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.43 of 2010, by the Sub-Court, Chidambaram, dated 21.10.2011, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.16 of 2008, by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipettai, dated 08.09.2010.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

JUDGMENT

When the matter was listed on 15.11.2021, there was no representation for the appellant and hence, the matter was directed to be posted to 26.11.2021, under the caption 'for dismissal'.

2.Even today (29.11.2021), when the matter is called none appeared for both the parties, inspite of the matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Accordingly, this Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dua To

1. The Sub-Judge, Chidambaram.

2. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipettai.

Copy To The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.62789 S.A.No.637 of 2012 VBM(CO) PM/15/12/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/