Murugan v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.01.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Murugan ... Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner, Ariyalur Municipality, Ariyalur District.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to collect the fee/toll from the petty vendors from the petty vendors who carry their goods in head and sell in the daily shandy/market in the respondent municipality as per their proceedings in Na.Ka.No.8160/2014/A1 dated 31.03.2015. For Petitioner : Ms.R.Poornima For Respondent : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar, Government Advocate

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner has made the following endorsement: "The tender period is over. The period is 01.04.2015 till 31.03.2018. Hence, the writ petition is infructuous." 1/3

2.

In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 31.01.2023 Index :Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-Speaking Order AT To The Commissioner, Ariyalur Municipality, Ariyalur District.

2/3

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

AT W.P.No.31312 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015 31.01.2023 3/3