Pavadaikonar v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.11.2024 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Pavadaikonar S/o.Ponnukonar .. Petitioner vs

1. The District Collector Tiruvannamalai District Tiruvannamalai

2. The Superintendent of Police Tiruvannamalai District Tiruvannamalai

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruvannamalai Revenue Division Thiruvannamalai District

4. The District Revenue Officer Collectorate

Thiruvannamalai District 5.

The Tahsildar Keelpennathur Taluk Thiruvannamalai District 6.

The Head Surveyor Keelpennathur Taluk Office Keelpennathur Thiruvannamalai District 7.

Babu S/o.Selvaraj 8.

Chandrasekaran S/o.Kesavan .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents 1 to 6 to consider the petitioner's representation / appeal dated 04.03.2021 and take proper action within a stipulated time as per the G.O (Ms).No.540, Revenue (LD6(2)) Department dated 04.12.2014. For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondents :

Mr.T.K.Saravanan Government Advocate for R1 to R6 Mr.K.Balasubramaniam for R8 Mr.R.Bharanidharan for R7

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.) Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the listing on 13.11.2024, which reads as follows: 'W.P.No.9967 of 2021 M.SUNDAR, J., K.RAJASEKAR, J., [Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR. J.,] There is no representation for writ petitioner either in the physical Court or on 'Videoconferencing' {'VC'} platform but Mr.V.Ravi, learned Special Government Pleader is before us in the physical Court. To be noted, this is a hybrid hearing, which is a daily / regular / routine feature in this Court.

2. However, with the intention of giving an opportunity to writ petitioner and learned counsel for writ petitioner, list this matter tomorrow (14.11.2024) under the

cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL'.

2. Captioned matter is listed under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL' but the position is no different today. To be noted, there was one more listing yesterday (14.11.2024).

3. Mr.T.K.Saravanan, learned Government Advocate for R1 to R6, Mr.R.Bharanidharan, learned counsel for R7 Mr.K.Balasubramaniam, learned counsel for R8 are before this Court.

4. As the writ petitioner has not come forward to pursue the writ petition in spite of sufficient opportunity being given, captioned WP is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. [M.S.,J] [K.R.S.,J] 15.11.2024 Index: Yes/No gpa

To

1. The District Collector Tiruvannamalai District Tiruvannamalai

2. The Superintendent of Police Tiruvannamalai District Tiruvannamalai

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruvannamalai Revenue Division Thiruvannamalai District

4. The District Revenue Officer Collectorate Thiruvannamalai District

5. The Tahsildar Keelpennathur Taluk Thiruvannamalai District

6. The Head Surveyor Keelpennathur Taluk Office Keelpennathur Thiruvannamalai District

M.SUNDAR,J., K.RAJASEKAR, J., gpa 15.11.2024