← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/4857/2026granted

Karthikeyan, (Male/24 Years), (A2), v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

2026-02-26Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. KARTHIKEYAN, (Male/24 years), (A2), No.2/121, Parainagar,Gummidigampatti Village,Tirupattur District 635 901

2. Prabu(a3) Son of Mr. Senthilkumar, G,1-135, Thannikinaru Vattam,Narsampatti Village, Tirupattur Taluk District 635 901 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Kandili Police Station, Tirupattur District (Crime No. 51 of 2026)No.2/121, Parainagar,Gummidigampatti Village,Tirupattur District 635 901 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 51 of 2026 pending investigation on file of the Respondent Police (Kandhili Police Station, Tirupattur District) and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s):

Magesh Kumar.S For Respondent(s):

M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS in Crime No. 51 of 2026, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioners abused and attacked the defacto complainant with hands and caused simple injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent person and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Therefore, he prays for grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the injured has been treated as an out-patient, and there are no previous cases against the petitioners and that A1 has been arrested and released on bail. However, she vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the above fact and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there are no bad antecedents against the petitioners and the co-accused has already been arrested and released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Tirupattur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition: (a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on

bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

26-02-2026 MPA To 1.The Judicial Magistrate-II, Tirupattur.

2.The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Kandili Police Station, Tirupattur District (Crime No. 51 of 2026) 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

MPA 26-02-2026