P.Neelakandan v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.NO.34501 OF 2012 AND M.P.NOS.1 & 2 OF 2012, 1 OF 2013 & 1 OF 2015 P.Neelakandan ... Petitioner Vs
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, (SGS I) Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 9.
2. The Commissioner of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.
3. The District Collector, District Collector's Office, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District.
4. The Project Officer, Samathuvapuram Project, District Collector's Office, Dharmapuri District.
5. The Tahsildhar, Palacode Taluk, Palacode, Dharmapuri District.
6. The Block Development Officer, Block Development Office, Palacode, Dharmapuri District.
7. The President, Selliyampatti Village Panchayat, Selliyampatti, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District.
...Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 3 to 7 to allot one house in Samathuvapuram situate at Kadukkapatti Village in Selliyampatti Panchayat, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajesh Krishnan For M/s.A.Ilaya Perumal For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajendiran Additional Government Pleader [For R1 to R5] Mr.G.Mutharasu [For R6 & R7]
O R D E R
The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents 3 to 7 to allot one house in Samathuvapuram situate at Kadukkapatti Village in Selliyampatti Panchayat, Palacode Taluk, Dharmapuri District to the petitioner.
2. The claim of the writ petitioner was rejected on the ground that he was not falling within the minimum eligibility criteria fixed and as per the minimum eligibility, the petitioner must have the disability of 70% and the petitioner in this case had 65% of disability during the relevant point of time.
3. However, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner died during the pendency of the writ petition and thus, no further consideration needs to be given in respect of the grounds raised.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kak
To
1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, (SGS I) Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 9.
2. The Commissioner of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai - 15.
3. The District Collector, District Collector's Office, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District.
4. The Project Officer, Samathuvapuram Project, District Collector's Office, Dharmapuri District.
5. The Tahsildhar, Palacode Taluk, Palacode, Dharmapuri District.
6. The Block Development Officer, Block Development Office, Palacode, Dharmapuri District.
+1cc to M/s.A.Ilaya Perumal, Advocate, S.R.No.64925 +1cc to Mr.G.Mutharasu, Advocate, S.R.No.65208 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.65857 W.P.No.34501 of 2012 PMK(CO) RLP(22/12/2021)