← Library
Madras High CourtWP/5659/2018dismissed for nonprosecution

R.Balan, S/O.Rakkappan, v. The District Collector

2023-11-09Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice D.Bharatha Chakravarthy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.11.2023 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY R.Balan ..

Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector District Collector Office Krishnagiri - 635 115.

2. The Assistant Director of Panchayats Office of the Assistant Director of Panchayats Krishnagiri - 635 115.

3. The Block Development Officer Panchayat Union Office Hosur - 635 109.

4. Mariappa

5. M/s.Santhiya Engineering Company Rep. by its Sole Proprietor Mahalakshmi, Ezhil Nagar Bagaepalli, Hosur Taluk Krishnagiri District.

..

Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to take appropriate action as against the fourth respondent for having misused the Government Development Fund allocated for the Begaypalli Panchayat under the control of the third respondent as per the Panchayat Act, and further direct the first respondent to remove the encroachment in the 25 feet breadth common road in Ezhil Nagar, Begaypalli Panchayat, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri committed by fifth respondent based on the petitioner's representations dated 09.12.2016 and 05.06.2017 made to the first respondent. For the Petitioner : No Appearance For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Government Pleader for R1 to R3 No appearance for R4 and R5

ORDER

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) On 21.09.2023, we had passed the following order: "None appears for the petitioner.

On 21.7.2023, adjournment was sought on behalf of the petitioner. Today also none appears for the petitioner.

As none appears for the petitioner, place the matter on 9.11.2023. If on the said date none appears for the petitioner, the court would be constrained to dismiss the writ petition."

2. Today also none appears for the petitioner.

3. As consistently none appears for the petitioner, the writ petition, as such, stands dismissed for non-prosecution. There will be no order as to costs.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 09.11.2023 Index :

Yes/No :

Yes/No drm To

1. The District Collector District Collector Office Krishnagiri - 635 115.

2. The Assistant Director of Panchayats Office of the Assistant Director of Panchayats Krishnagiri - 635 115.

3. The Block Development Officer Panchayat Union Office, Hosur - 635 109.

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

(drm) 09.11.2023